It’s good for my worldly soul to wait for books. And wait is what I did for 6 weeks as my latest read was rowed here in a pirogue from England. But it was worth the wait. The new book is God’s Power to Save: One Gospel for a Complex World? (Apollos/IVP; Leicester, England; 2006) edited by Chris Green. Today I provide you with one morsel from the book. It’s on the topic of the gospel, the kingdom, and evangelism—
…We have seen that in the Synoptics and Acts, ‘the gospel’ and ‘the kingdom’ are fundamentally related. They are not different messages, as some old-school liberals might once have tried to have us believe. But nor is it adequate to see them as two different ways of describing the same reality but with different vocabularies, which different people might find easier or harder to accept. That thought might seem on the surface to be evangelistically useful, because we could talk using different kinds of language to different groups of people, according to their needs and pastoral appropriateness, but it is actually flawed. If I could explain the gospel to people, fully and without distortion, and do so without leading them to expect forgiveness for sin on the basis of the cross (for instance), then what I have produced is not alternative language but an alternative gospel, because the substance has changed.
Put simply, the gospel of the kingdom as we find it in Acts is the announcement of forgiveness and the gift of the Spirit that flow necessarily from the throne of the crucified and risen Saviour-King. We saw above that the appropriate response to hearing the gospel is repentance and faith. To ask people to repent and believe when they have heard a message that does not focus on the death and resurrection of Jesus actually asks for a different reason for repentance and a different message to believe. Do they, then, receive forgiveness and the gift of the Spirit? Since we have seen that talking about the kingdom requires us to talk about the cross, any such detachment must be theologically, and spiritually, disastrous.
There are many audiences, but only one gospel. To present that one gospel under the language of the kingdom is not necessarily to alter it. But if we use it because we think someone is more likely to respond to the language of the kingdom than that of, say, justification or forgiveness, and that is precisely because we wrongly think the kingdom does not operate in that theological field, then we have altered it by distorting the cross-work of the king.
—Chris Green, God’s Power to Save: One Gospel for a Complex World? (Apollos/IVP; Leicester, England; 2006), pp. 136–137. To date, the book has not been published in the U.S. and is a bit tough to find—hence the wait and the pirogue.
10 thoughts on “The Kingdom, Gospel Faithfulness, and Evangelism”
There is a church in my area that uses this as a part of their core values:
“The MESSAGE doesn’t change, but the methods of COMMUNICATING it have to.
The MISSION doesn’t change, but the means of fulfilling it have to.”
Let me ask you, do you see this (at the very least) to coming close and almost flirting with changing the Gospel in order to get people in the church?
any chance you could provide us with a link to the table of contents?
Sure! Click here. For the most part, the church seems to say the right thing. But what concerns me is the apparent lack of depth. I think it is partially due to the fact that there is not much (if any) consideration for historical Christianity. They are growing very quickly and very much an ‘in’ church which seems to attract large numbers and having talked to a few people who have chosen not to go there anymore based on this. I wonder if this is due to getting the attention of people, but not getting them discipled.
sorry for the miscommunication, i was actually hoping that Tony could provide us with a link to the table of contents for the new book he got :)
Ha! That’s probably the best laugh I have had all day. Sorry about that.
cameo: Click on the “IVP” link at the top of the post…
thepuritans: It would be difficult to say based upon this limited information. If the message proclaimed is unchanged, it will prove offensive to the modern mind and the methods–no matter how creative–will always be secondary. If the message changes, the methods become primary and the offense of the cross is muted. In this case, there is much to be concerned about. But I could not say based upon general information in this case. I pray they are faithful to the message!
thanks. that looks great…
Good point on the primacy of the message and secondary nature of method. Thanks!
Tim Keller’s a big fan of that book. I like it too. Good job on ordering it from the IVP-UK (I love IVP-UK – much better than their US cousins).