Few passages are more commonly misread, or simply avoided, than Hebrew 13:17:
Obey your leaders and submit to them, for they are keeping watch over your souls, as those who will have to give an account.
It shouldn’t surprise us that this passage often goes avoided. This is bound to happen in a culture where postmodernism rejects all claims of authority and where examples of abuses of authority are not hard to find in the news.
To make matters worse, a surface reading of this passage seems to sanction some form of authoritarianism, an unqualified obedience and submission to pastors in all matters. But that’s not the message of this passage, as we will see.
What follows are a few important thoughts on this passage, beginning with a closer look at the idea of “obeying.”
Here is how W. E. Vine defines the Greek word “obey” (πείθο):
In Hebrews 13:17, believers are commanded to obey their leaders. The word used is peithō which has the usual meaning of “convince” or “persuade.” The “obedience” suggested is not by submission to authority, but resulting from persuasion. Peithō and pisteuō, “to trust,” are closely related etymologically; the difference in meaning is that the former implies the obedience that is produced by the latter.
Peithō, “to persuade, to win over,” in the passive and middle voices, “to be persuaded, to listen to, to obey,” is so used with this meaning, in the middle voice, e.g., in Acts 5:36-37 (in v. 40, passive voice, “they agreed”); Rom. 2:8; Gal. 5:7; Heb. 13:17; Jas. 3:3.
The “obedience” suggested is not by submission to authority, but resulting from persuasion. Peithō and pisteuo, ‘to trust,’ are closely related etymologically; the difference in meaning is that the former implies the obedience that is produced by the latter.
In other words, when “one allows oneself to be convinced by someone: one follows and obeys him” (EDNT).
Paul Benware applies this point well in an article [“Leadership Authority in the Church,” Conservative Theological Journal 3.8 (1989), pp. 10-12]:
The emphasis here [Heb. 13:17] is on an obedience that comes from being persuaded that something is true. In this case, it would be the truth of the Word of God that is in view. Here they are being called upon to persuade the people that follow them with the truth of the Word of God… The elders are not to say “Do it because I say so”, but rather “Do what I show you from God’s Word.” …
Leadership authority in the church, then, is the power granted to men to lead the flock of God according to the Word of God, guiding, protecting and feeding them for their benefit and God’s glory. This kind of leadership authority will persuade believers from the scriptures resulting in obedience and submission to Christ the one and only head of the church.
John Owen says much the same in his commentary on Hebrews 13:17:
1st. It is not a blind, implicit obedience and subjection, that is here prescribed. A pretence hereof hath been abused to the ruin of the souls of men: but there is nothing more contrary to the whole nature of gospel obedience, which is our “reasonable service;” and in particular, it is that which would frustrate all the rules and directions given unto believers in this epistle itself, as well as elsewhere, about all the duties that are required of them. For to what purpose are they used, if no more be required but that men give up themselves, by an implicit credulity, to obey the dictates of others?
2dly. It hath respect unto them in their office only. If those who suppose themselves in office do teach and enjoin things that belong not unto their office, there is no obedience due unto them by virtue of this command. So is it with the guides of the church of Rome, who, under a pretence of their office, give commands in secular things, no way belonging unto the ministry of the gospel.
3dly. It is their duty so to obey whilst they teach the things which the Lord Christ hath appointed them to teach; for unto them is their commission limited, Matt. 28:20: and to submit unto their rule whilst it is exercised in the name of Christ, according to his institution, and by the rule of the word, and not otherwise. When they depart from these, there is neither obedience nor submission due unto them.
Finally, Matthew Henry, in his old (and under-appreciated) commentary, offers this pointed one-sentence summary:
Christians must submit to be instructed by their ministers, and not think themselves too wise, too good, or too great, to learn from them; and, when they find that ministerial instructions are agreeable to the written word, they must obey them.
Ultimately pastoral ministry centers on Christ and His Message, not on the pastor and his role as messenger. And so to obey and submit to our pastors is a call to esteem and respect and obey the Word of God. This is why it can be said that “an elder with no Bible is an elder with no authority” (Mark Lauterbach).
Hebrews 13:17 is beautifully balanced and stabilizing for Christians who live in a culture suspicious of all authority. It encourages our biblical discernment. It encourages us to find a solid church where the Bible is taught clearly and persuasively. It moves our attention off autonomous human authority. It focuses our attention on the weightiness of Scripture. And it encourages humble submission of our lives to the faithful preaching and counsel we receive from our still-fallible pastors. It is a passage that helps us see the faithfully preached word for what it is — an authoritative message from God to be obeyed.
6 thoughts on “Obey Your Pastors and Submit to Them”
Thanks for this post. I definitely agree with the main point here, but I think that Vine might be committing the fallacy of “illegitimate totality transfer” with respect to πειθω (assuming that any or every portion of a word’s semantic domain can apply to any context or syntactical scenario), and possibly also the root fallacy. BDAG classifies πειθω in Heb. 13:17 under the gloss “obey, follow” due to its context and the fact that its object is a personal dative (p. 792). We should also note that πειθω is not the only verb that is used in this verse; the believer’s actions are also described by υπεικω, which is defined as “to yield to someone’s authority” (p. 1030).
Again, I think the over-all point is certainly correct. The pastor’s authority is not intrinsic but derivative; believers are commanded to submit only insofar as they are being exhorted to believe and apply Scriptural truth. But I think that this point comes not from the use of a particular verb, but from the broader Biblical presentation.
Yes, good points. Re: πειθω see also TDNT and EDNT, those were helpful for me. I think πειθω helps make sense of what the believer submits to in υπεικω. It defines the authority in a helpful way.
submission have turned to be the most forgotten thing and we dont seem to see how import it is. The Trinity submits to one another the Son submits to the Father and the Spirit submits to the Son and moreover even the Father submits to his word. So there is scarcity of preaching on submission and obedience.
I am glad you have posted this article. Years ago, I was part of the “shepherding movement” that focuses heavily on “spiritual covering” and “submission” to leaders. I am aware that not many in the Reformed or conservative evangelical churches may have heard of this movement. What I experienced was not that there was a lack of authority or lack of submission to church authority. Instead, I lived in a system that thrives on implicit and absolute obedience in every aspect of our lives and in absolute submission to our leaders and “spiritual mentors”, even in areas where Scripture is silent. Recently, I mentioned about my experiences in that movement to one of my pastor and a ruling elder in the Reformed church of which I am currently part of. Both of them (whom I regard as faithful leaders who faithfully teach Scripture correctly and proclaim the true gospel) lamented about these sad state of affairs in churches that are deeply authoritarian. May the good Lord open our hearts to embrace the biblical understanding of submission.
Thank you!! I cannot tell you how helpful this article was to read. This also made me think of how Jesus leads his flock in John 10:4, “…the sheep follow him, for they know his voice.” How kind that God himself doesn’t callously tell us to blindly obey but even He convinces us from His Word, trains us to know His voice and desires us to follow Him because we know him and have been convinced from his Word to obey! This article grew my love for the Good Shepherd, so thank you!
I agree and recieve this in the name of Jesus! Thank you for explaining that so well. I am currently in the process of breaking OUT of a cultish tyoe of church. They have all KINDS of man made by-laws and rules thatvare burdensome to me! And they are ALWAYS preaching about how we ahould always submit to our pastors without question. And if we do not then we have a “heart condition”. Man… this is so freeing!! Not to sin, but to live according to the Holy Ghost.