Carl Trueman on Historical Theology (Book Recommendations)

A few years back Carl Trueman provided me with some book recommendations that turned out to have great personal value. During a lecture on church history Trueman answered the following question from the audience:

There was one question that I was asked: Could I recommend a book to read alongside the historical theology module run by Moore College? Two things I would recommend there:

(1) The series being written by a guy named Nicholas Needham. It’s called 2,000 Years of Christ’s Power (Evangelical Press) and is proving to be a very good, comprehensive, but easy-to-read account of church history. It comes in several volumes.

(2) And the other book I recommend to students, the best single-volume on the history of theology, written by a Scandinavian Lutheran named Bengt Hägglund, is titled History of Theology. It’s a single volume that takes you from the early church almost down to the present day in terms of the history of theology. So those would be the two books I would recommend.

These would prove to become fruitful recommendations. History of Theology by Bengt Hägglund (Concordia: 2007) is very good and worth picking up. But in this post I want to focus more on the 2000 Years of Christ’s Power series by N.R. Needham (Evangelical Press):

Part One: The Age of the Early Fathers (Evangelical Press: 1998). Paperback, 400 pages.

Part Two: The Middle Ages (Evangelical Press: 2000). Paperback, 460 pages.

Part Three: Renaissance and Reformation (Evangelical Press: 2004). Paperback, 624 pages.

All three volumes sell for $55.28 at Westminster.

I have read two of the three volumes. Here are my preliminary notes:

• Rev. Dr. Nick Needham is a Baptist pastor and teaches church history at Highland Theological College in Dingwall, Scotland. His series of writings are written for a popular audience of modern Christian readers. The back cover notes this series was written “in a style that will appeal to the non-specialist and any modern Christian will find it challenging and stimulating.” I agree. Needham is a lucid author that presents a great amount of detail while keeping me engaged. His masterful use of frequent section breaks, clearly numbered outlines, boldly-fonted names, and visual aids keep me reading long sections very comfortably. These volumes excel in readability.

• In the beginning of Part Three: Renaissance and Reformation, Needham states he is “Reformed by theological conviction” (3:12). On the same page he goes on to say, “I have little sympathy with that form of ‘ecumenism’ which relativises, and thereby trivialises, the convictions for which men and women lived and fought and died in the 16th century. That isn’t to say I disapprove of deeper understanding among the different religious traditions that claim the name of Christian; I approve heartily. But sometimes, deeper understanding will lead us to appreciate just how deeply we do differ on not a few issues, despite surprising measures of agreement on others. Papering over the cracks in the interests of some ecumenical ‘happy family’ game, in which sincerity is more highly prized than truth, is not this writer’s agenda, either as a historian or a Churchman.”

• The publisher plugs these volumes as a series on church history not explicitly a historical theology although it’s pretty obvious these volumes simultaneously cover the historical and theological development of the church. Probably, I find myself engaged by the content because of the author’s obvious interest in theology. Remember Trueman recommended Needham in answering a question about books on historical theology. A fitting recommendation.

• Needham clearly and concretely explains the broad political, social, and economic climate, then weaves in the specific writers, preachers, leaders, and books that shaped the theology. The volume covering the theological developments during the Middle Ages was fascinating, probably because I have previously dissed the era as a theological trifle. It was not. Especially noteworthy was Needham’s chapter on the global rise of Islam and its impact on Christian theology (2:15-45). I was surprised to learn John of Damascus (675-749) ministered under Islamic rule and even acted as a Prime Minister to the local Islamic rule! Within these medieval debates over Islamic theology opened controversies on the Trinity, incarnation, God’s sovereignty, and the nature of worship. These debates were handled by men like John of Damascus and Thomas Aquinas. My point is: Needham’s scope of content expands beyond the walls of the church to provide necessary historical background in the theological developments within the walls.

• Each chapter concludes with a well-selected sampling of original source material.

• Each volume includes a very detailed glossary, an extensive index of names and (best of all) an extensive subject index.

• The covers make for an odd marriage. The bottom 1/3rd is nice, featuring a line of portraits. The upper 2/3rds however are not so attractive. If the bottom appeals to a reader of cultured artistic tastes, I would say the top will catch the attention of roughly the same folks that pack a NASCAR race in the hopes of witnessing an explosion.

• Permit me to construct a hypothetical. What if the title of these volumes was swapped out for something like — The History of the Church and Her Theology — or something to highlight the excellent historical theology? What if they were reprinted as hardcovers with clean and classy dustjack design? Perhaps some light ornamentation on the cover like Yale’s Gombrich? What if the pages featured the torn, antique paper edge like you see in popular historical volumes like 1776 and Alexander Hamilton? And what if the text font was changed from Times New-Roman to a more graceful Garamond? These volumes may not carry the narrative and dialogue intrigue of books like 1776, but a new format would more accurately capture the history contained in these volumes and would perhaps appeal to a larger audience.

Format issues aside, Needham’s works are readable and provide us with a nice contribution to church history and historical theology. Thank you Carl Trueman!

My Awesome Birthday Cake

In case you missed it on Facebook or Twitter, my birthday was last Friday. My gluten free triple-fountain-encore monster truck cake (feat. Grave Digger) was pure chocolate awesomeness. Here are two iPhone pics of the end result. Note how the cocoa powder dusting gave the entire scene a nice authentic appearance. And it was delicious too! My wife rocks.

And here’s the inspiration, a YouTube clip of a real encore fountain feat. Grave Digger (2 trucks):

My 2011 Goals, Or, Why I’m Not A Resolution Guy

To “resolve” is to determine to start doing (or to stop doing) something. It’s all about habits, really—breaking bad habits and starting good habits. I don’t set resolutions. The reason I don’t is because I find that my habits usually change only once I have a goal in view. So I tend to put the emphasis on goals. I tend to get better results by setting a target first. That’s why I am not a resolution guy, more of a goal guy.

In 2010 I set out with one big goal: to write a 55,000-word book. So on January 4, 2010 I sat at my desk, opened a new Word document on my computer, and began writing a book. It was really frightening at first, but as the days and months passed and the book began to take shape, I started to realize the incredible potential of 12-month project.

The lesson I learned from the experience is that 365 days is a period of time long enough to achieve one BIG goal. I guess I knew this. I’m reminded of this importance of long-range goals by a quote that I keep on my computer desktop from Mark Dever. He says, “Young men tend to overestimate what they can accomplish in the short term and underestimate what they can accomplish in the long term.” Over time I have discovered the deep wisdom of those words.

On October 29, I delivered my book manuscript to the publisher (I consider 12 months a “long term”). Apart from two short writing retreats, my book was completely written in my free time, days off, and vacations. I had plenty of time to complete the book in one year, and I had more meaningful time with my wife and kids this year than in any other. I suspect my life patterns were molded and shaped by my goals.

So what about the next 12 months?

In December I began putting together a list of goals for the year. These are more individual goals since as a family we have our own list of goals for 2011. My personal goals include these three:

1. Write the bulk of book #2. As soon as I delivered the Lit! manuscript to the publisher I began working on book #2. This next book is centered on the Christian life and is quite unrelated to the content of Lit! In comparison, the length is substantially longer and it will require a full 19 months to write. But I estimate that over the next 12 months I can write a bulk of the content. My goal is to write 50,000 of the total 70,000 words, or about 70%. And that’s a very reasonable goal, if I use my free time very wisely. At some point, perhaps in the fall, I’ll share more about book #2.

2. Write a 30,000-word collection of reflections on pastoral ministry. For three years I have been compiling notes and observations as I have worked and traveled alongside my friend and boss C.J. He offers much pastoral wisdom to pastors and I’m hoping to take some time throughout the year to write short reflections on what I’ve learned from him. It should be fun. Again, perhaps by the fall this project will take shape.

3. Lose 75 pounds. This is the loftiest goal of all, really. It’s certainly the most intimidating, the most likely to not happen, and the one goal that is most likely to kick my rear and leave me black and blue in a dark alley. My target weight is 240 pounds (do the math) and hitting this target will require focus and commitment. I’ve put a lot of thought into how to go about losing the weight, since this is a battle that will be waged on three fronts: (1) spiritual (cultivating self-control, confronting gluttony, etc), (2) making wise food choices, and (3) becoming consistent in my workouts. I hope to lose the weight this year without joining a gym or eating processed diet foods. Throughout the year I do plan to write some brief blog meditations to help me win the battle on the spiritual front.

So those are my goals, and that explains why I’m not really the “resolving” type. I don’t want to workout and write; I want to lose weight and complete projects. I would rather let my goals, rather than a list resolutions, change my habits.

Maybe resolutions are not for you. Maybe goals are a better focus. So what are your goals for 2011?

Top 10 Blog Posts of 2010

According to the WordPress stats, here’s a list of the 10 most viewed posts on this blog in the last 12 months (in order):

1. On Burning Religious Books (This post was picked up by journalists and found its way into a Dutch magazine. Crazy!)

2. Christ-Centered Education (Mostly due to a John Piper tweet.)

3. The 30 Best Books I Read in 2010

4. Does God Delight In Non-Christian Art?

5. Review: Logos Bible Software 4

6. Union with Christ

7. Baseball: Spring Training Has Begun! (Posted during the winter Olympics.)

8. Young, Restless, Reformed, and Humbled

9. How to NOT Listen to Sermons

10. The Problem with “Incarnational” Ministry

That anyone comes here, reads, and passes links and shares content is really humbling to me. Thanks for reading this meager blog.

Blessings!

Tony